Document comparison: acceptance checklist
Define how to recognise a usable result. Start with two approved document versions and plan a cited change summary.
Available remotely for local and international enquiries. Platform choice and final scope depend on your requirements.
The project in view
- Start with
- two approved document versions.
- Proposed result
- a cited change summary.
- A decision to resolve
- formatting changes obscuring a substantive edit.
This is a planning example. It does not describe a completed client engagement.
Acceptance checklist for this project
- Evaluate source accuracy, unsupported questions and tool permissions using a fixed question set.
- Write the expected content and format of a cited change summary against one agreed sample.
- Include a failing example involving formatting changes obscuring a substantive edit, and agree the correct response.
Questions to answer together
- What is the expected result for one agreed example?
- Which edge cases must pass before signoff?
- Who accepts the result, and where is that decision recorded?
What to have at the end
A repeatable acceptance pack with examples, expected outcomes and signoff criteria.
Record the decision on formatting changes obscuring a substantive edit alongside the source material. If it is still unresolved, identify who can answer it and what work depends on the answer.
Prepare your enquiry
Use this as a starting point. Add your current process, available examples and constraints before sharing.
Send your completed brief to hello@iansamonte.com or visit the main page to discuss your project.