Customer support drafting: human review points
Give reviewers specific decisions to make. Start with redacted support threads and approved guidance and plan draft replies for an agent to approve.
Available remotely for local and international enquiries. Platform choice and final scope depend on your requirements.
The project in view
- Start with
- redacted support threads and approved guidance.
- Proposed result
- draft replies for an agent to approve.
- A decision to resolve
- promises that are not supported by policy.
This is a planning example. It does not describe a completed client engagement.
Human review points for this project
- Assign a reviewer who understands redacted support threads and approved guidance.
- Present draft replies for an agent to approve beside its source so corrections can be checked.
- Require an explicit decision on promises that are not supported by policy; keep the decision in the review record.
Questions to answer together
- Which result must be approved before it is used?
- What source evidence should the reviewer see?
- How is a rejected result corrected and checked again?
What to have at the end
A review matrix with decision owners, evidence and a correction route.
Record the decision on promises that are not supported by policy alongside the source material. If it is still unresolved, identify who can answer it and what work depends on the answer.
Prepare your enquiry
Use this as a starting point. Add your current process, available examples and constraints before sharing.
Send your completed brief to hello@iansamonte.com or visit the main page to discuss your project.